NOTE: This is an older post I wrote 10 years ago this month and during Trump's first run for the presidency.
I am now witnessing enough of the motivations I had suspected during his first presidency come to fruition in his second presidency, that I feel validated in those suspicions, unfortunately.
Whether anyone I expressed those suspicions to before have reconsidered, now that we have a second look at Trump's self-proclaimed intentions,It is apparent that more have actually reaffirmed their support of Trump.
I should know better by now.
I have seen the very same thing happen on a much smaller scale, with church being the setting.
My intention at this time is to reveal how my extreme, right-wing conservative political and fundamentalist Baptist history as a child, adult parent and as an aging adult has convinced me to embrace a more authentic position on all those former dogmatic positions.
To those people I know, who have similar backgrounds-- who may identify with my discovery and recovery process-- but who have not found the strength to express them,
I am speaking to you...
This older writing marks the beginning of my journey towards a whole new political identity...and it is my very own.
This season’s political climate has stirred me to question my formerly-held beliefs that America--it's foundation, founders and founding documents--is positively, expressly ‘Christian’..
Though principles drawn from the Bible have INFLUENCED its foundational governance, that is not the same as being ESTABLISHED as a Christian nation. This would make it a Theocracy instead of a Constitutional Republic and democracy.
There is a difference in being influenced by and founded upon.
The first is about recognition and acknowledgment of Christian principles The latter is about entitlement.
Many conservative Christians fervently believe America’s heritage to be of the ‘Judeo-Christian’ tradition. Those who believe this to be fact also expect this Judeo-Christian tradition to be by right of establishment and thus should be reflected in its laws and governance.
So, what does this term‘Judeo-Christian even mean?
Judeo-Christian values are somewhat dubiously defined as those values, ethics, principles etc. that Judaism and Christianity have in common. It was made popular by conservatives to describe their political ideals.
From Wikipedia:
From Wikipedia:
The present meaning of "Judeo-Christian" regarding ethics first appeared in print in an book review by the English writer George Orwell in 1939, with the phrase "the Judaeo-Christian scheme of morals."[5] The term gained currency in the 1940s, promoted by groups which evolved into the National Conference of Christians and Jews. They intended to fight antisemitism by using a more inclusive idea of values.[6][7] By 1952 Dwight Eisenhower looked to the Founding Fathers of 1776 to say:
- "all men are endowed by their Creator." In other words, our form of government has no sense unless it is founded in a deeply felt religious faith, and I don't care what it is. With us of course it is the Judeo-Christian concept, but it must be a religion with all men created equal.[8]
The contention, simply put, is that Judaism rejects Christianity and Christianity rejects Judaism.
But enough of that.
Perhaps these 'christians' should examine the real reasons they find certain diverse people make them so uncomfortable?
Do they pose a threat? If so, what kind of threat? Physical? Spiritual? Cultural? Racial? All of these?
Are they all a physical threat to our safety? Statistics don't support this.
Is it their various religious beliefs? Are we concerned they will convert our children? Do we fear our children will intermarry with people of different colors, cultures and beliefs?
If so, why is our faith, culture, and confidence in adult offsprings' choices all so fragile as justify condemning and controlling these possible outcomes?
Could fear and prejudice have more to do with it?
Truth is, this country has already dealt with these kinds of concerns only to find that none brought this country to ruin as feared and predicted.
In fact,
I can just off the top of my head think of many falsehoods believed by the majority in this country, along with the accompanying dreadful attempts to prevent and mitigate them.
Most all turned out to be just, falsehoods.
To name just a few:
*Black people are subhuman
*Black people are inferior and less intelligent that white people
*Slavery was biblical, good and right
*Women should have less rights than men
*Women were too emotional to be leaders
*Racial intermarriages could never be happy ones
*Races should be segregated
And on, and on, and on, and on.
This is the cause--I believe-- to be at the heart of the whole ‘return-to-America’s-Judeo-Christian-heritage’ cry.
How can one expect to make this country into a heavenly kingdom consistent with the fundamentalist/literalist interpretation of the biblical ideal without using some kind of coercion or even violence?


Comments
Post a Comment